Processing
01Lawfulness and transparency
Teams can explain recording, drafting, and documentation behavior before capture starts, with the lawful basis surfaced in onboarding material.
Compliance
CortexaNote is designed around lawful processing, minimization, access boundaries, and data-subject rights. A Data Processing Agreement is ready for organizations operating under GDPR, and EU-resident hosting is available on request.
Mapped signals
CortexaNote keeps framework, security control, workflow ownership, and review responsibility visible on one page.
Trust packet
A serious safety page makes compliance proof inspectable. CortexaNote keeps that rhythm without pretending gated reports are public downloads.
Security reviews, agreement requests, status checks, and framework evidence are separate artifacts. Keeping them explicit prevents the page from collapsing procurement, operations, and legal review into one vague trust claim.
GDPR packet
A CortexaNote Data Processing Agreement is ready for organizations operating under GDPR. Route the request through sales and trust review to get the executed copy.
Trust center
Live posture, control summaries, security policies, and procurement evidence are published in the CortexaNote trust center.
Procurement
Ask for the right questionnaire response, agreement, or architecture summary for your procurement workflow.
Operations
Uptime and incident communication live outside marketing copy so operations teams can inspect them directly.
Controls
Privacy-by-design controls for teams handling EU personal data.
Processing
01Teams can explain recording, drafting, and documentation behavior before capture starts, with the lawful basis surfaced in onboarding material.
Scope
02The product flow keeps the generated note and review task central instead of encouraging unmanaged exports, training collections, or shadow copies.
Consent
03Clinicians can align capture with patient consent, organizational policy, and jurisdictional requirements without leaving the workflow.
Rights
04Retention, access, rectification, portability, and deletion paths stay explicit so administrators can respond to patient and clinician requests within statutory windows.
Design
05Recorder capture, transcript handling, workspace governance, EHR handoff, and AI improvement loops are modeled together so privacy is not bolted on after launch.
Response
06Incident response, regulator notification, and customer communication are exercised as part of the operating model rather than as a static policy paragraph.
Data lifecycle
The boundary is not one database table. It is the whole journey from patient conversation to approved note.
01
Clinicians record only inside the authorization, consent, and operating policies required by their organization.
02
Audio moves from Recorder or browser capture through encrypted transfer into a protected clinical workspace.
03
AI output stays draft work until a qualified clinician checks the note, edits it, and approves the final record.
04
Teams can move approved text into the EHR and keep retention decisions explicit instead of hidden in the tool.
CortexaNote works best when clinical, operations, procurement, and trust owners evaluate the same Recorder + AI scribe + EHR workflow.